They REALLY Love the Price
On a day when Dan Ellis went for $3mill / 2yrs, Chris Mason went for $3.7 mill / 2yrs, and Marty Biron went for $1.8mill / 2yrs, Pierre Gauthier signed backup goalie Alex Auld, who played 24 games last year, for $1mill/1yr.
I am scratching my head a little about this. Why trade for Ellis and not sign him at such a favorable rate? Ellis is certainly better than Auld.
Maybe Ellis wanted a guarantee of 40 + games? But then why did Ellis give several interviews in Montreal saying he would be comfortable playing behind Price? Maybe that’s what he said in public but felt otherwise in private?
Or, is the salary cap really that tight that even an extra $500k would cause issues for Pierre Gauthier? Maybe Gauthier really is planning to keep Dominic Moore, and wants to save every penny? But then why not sign Biron, who comes in even cheaper, and can mentor Carey and take the heat off of him with the press? Maybe Gauthier didn’t want to give him a two-year deal and didn’t want to run the risk of having the local press jeer on Carey in favor of homeboy Biron?
Or, maybe, with so many of the big name free agents already signed, Gauthier has some other kind of trade up his sleeve to get a player like Frolov? I still can’t see this happening, but maybe.
In Auld, Gauthier gets a very low-cost goalie, who is younger than 30, has a lot of international experience and has put up some decent numbers. Maybe decent enough that Gauthier thinks the extra $500k going to Ellis could be better spent elsewhere?
But I can’t help but think that getting Auld also serves as some kind of peace offering to Carey Price as well. Think about it: Auld is the same size as Price, so goalie coach Pierre Groulx will work with both goalies the same way, so Auld and Price will be learning off the same page. This limits the potential for any confusion. Auld also comes from the West Coast, too. Added bonus for BC native Price.
But maybe its because Auld is clearly not going to be a number 1 goalie, that makes him so attractive to Gauthier. Price will never be threatened by Auld or fear that his job is always at risk. No Halak breathing down his back.If Gauthier had signed Ellis, I imagine the possibility would have always existed that Ellis could have taken over.
Two things are for sure, I think:
1 – Gauthier has a lot of faith in Price: Price will play A LOT of games. We already knew that.
2- Price’s contract will cost more than we originally thought. There is no other explanation for why Gauthier would go for Auld, when marginally more expensive, but much better goalies were available. The only reason I can think of, barring an attempt at keeping Moore or some other move, is that Price is asking for $2.5 – $3million / year, minimum, and that puts more pressure on the cap.
I hope I am wrong about this. I hope the Auld signing comes down to money / something else in the works. But if it doesn’t, signing Auld, to me, looks like the Habs are once again coddling a player who has not yet fully earned the mantle of Number One Goalie.
This really does strike me as weird.








2 comments ↓
To start with I had no stated preference between Price and Halak only a preference for winning.
The Ellis/Auld development is to say the least disappointing.
Gauthier’s arrogance in reannointing Price as the designated saviour of the Canadiens is one thing but to do so with:
a) Absolutely no contingency plan in goal except for Auld and Sanford (is this a joke?)
b) Not having addressed the lack of secondary scoring support whatsoever.
c) Not having addressed the lack of team toughness in any way shape or form.
When Gauthier traded Halak he stated that two quality goaltenders were required in order to succeed in the present NHL and going out and signing a bargain-basement journeyman (Auld has not bounced in and out of nine NHL cities for nothing!) as his replacement for overachieving Halak is unbelievable.
The difference between what Ellis got from Tampa and what Gauthier shelled out for Auld is less than the puzzling $574,000 raise given to Benoit Pouliot for underachieving in 2009-2010.
Many will say that Gauthiers’ hands were tied by the cap but 1/2 a million for Ellis as a competent, level headed, mentally mature goaltender insurance policy vs. two career losers ( Auld and Sanford) and an unproven, at least at the NHL level, underachiever seems like peanuts.
Price has done little in his NHL stint to convince anyone that he has what it takes to not only play 60 games, but play a full 60 minutes in each game and but win more games than lose.
If having Ellis in the background would somehow intimidate or influence Prices’ psyche shows just how fragile he is mentally and proves he is not ready for number 1 status or work load.
Roy,
I totally agree with you. The Habs have not really done anything to improve on their weak areas (size up front, youth and quickness on the D, bloated cap). They have gotten younger and gotten more depth in the prospects department. But not a lot.
The goaltender thing is bonkers. In the end, I don’t know if Ellis really wanted to play here because he knew Price would get at least 45 starts. And Ellis could get that elsewhere. I wonder if Gauthier really did everything he could to keep Ellis, and thus, make that Sergei trade even more of a win for him. That one move could have changed the off-season. But ok, it didn’t work out. Even with that, I’m still scratching my head over why Turco, Biron, or even Hedberg weren’t considered, apparently.
Leave a Comment